Canadian photographer 'sorry' for explicit image sharing

BBC TECH

Tech / BBC TECH 263 Views 0

Canadian photographer 'sorry' for specific picture sharing

man holding cameraPicture copyright Getty Photographs

A Canadian photographer and comic has admitted posting specific photographs of girls together with their names on controversial web discussion board 4Chan.

Nevertheless, he denied doing so for "malicious intent" - a apply referred to as doxxing.

Ren Bostelaar apologised for his actions however stated the photographs had already been posted elsewhere on the web by the ladies themselves.

Toronto Police is investigating however no fees have been made.

The allegations have been made on social media by a number of ladies who claimed they have been contacted by males after their pictures and particulars appeared on 4Chan.

A few of their tales date again to 2005, they declare.

They are saying the pictures have been by no means meant for public viewing and have been shared in closed teams.

It's unclear whether or not Mr Bostelaar was the unique photographer.

Underneath the Canadian Criminal Code it's unlawful to distribute pictures "figuring out that the individual depicted within the picture didn't give their consent to that conduct".

'Deeply remorseful'

The photographer issued an apology on Fb through which he described his behaviour as "reprehensively dangerous" however has since deleted all his social media accounts.

"Mr Bostelaar is deeply remorseful for his actions," stated his lawyer Sam Goldstein in a press release.

"The images he re-posted have been pictures that the ladies themselves had posted on the web in public boards resembling Fb, Reddit, or Tumblr.

"He didn't intentionally disseminate personal particulars for malicious intent."

Mr Goldstein added that "not each private ethical failing requires judicial intervention".

Ren Bostelaar is among the writers in a profitable satire group referred to as Stats Canada.

The group tweeted to its 603,000 followers that his behaviour was "utterly inexcusable".

Comments